Friday, November 30, 2007

Comments: I’m aware of complaints and will deal with them, says Pak Lah

I'm aware of complaints and will deal with them, says Pak Lah

SUBANG JAYA: Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has assured the people that he is listening with his "big ears" to all complaints and grievances.

The Prime Minister said he was aware of complaints about "what is happening to our economy, ... to this, and that."

"I listen. The Prime Minister has big ears.

"At times pedih lah telinga ini – macam macam dengar (it is painful to these ears - hearing all sorts of things)," he said at the official opening of SJK (C) Ladang Harcroft in Puchong yesterday.

Abdullah stressed that he was not merely listening, adding that it was his duty to deal with problems and work on remedies.

"We are not keeping quiet. If we do not attend to problems, grouses, feelings of uneasiness, uncertainty and even anger, then one day we will suffer, everybody will suffer," he said.

"If you are getting impatient, then I'm even more impatient," he added.

In HONG KONG, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said the Government was committed to addressing the "legitimate concerns" of any community in Malaysia.

The Deputy Prime Minister, who was speaking at a press conference during his roadshow to promote Malaysia to fund managers, said the rally by the Hindu Rights Action Front was due to exploitation by opposition parties anticipating the general election.

He described the New Economic Policy as an affirmative action policy that benefited all communities.

"Otherwise, this Government would not have been returned to power in each general election," he said.

Source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2007/12/1/nation/19636439&sec=nation&focus=1

Comments

From a common perspective of the people, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has no initiative to deal with the problem of marginalization of ethnic races namely the Indians and Chinese. Ibans are not spared when they are moving out of their home state of Sarawak to dwell in West Malaysia. This is evidenced by unequal number of jobs intake in government sector and using the terms like Bumi and Non-Bumi as a form of marginalization.

During the current tenure of PM by Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, one sees the street demonstration of BERSIH by some 40,000 people last November 10, 2007, the highest street demo in the decade. However a foolish politician simply remarked that the calls for a free judiciary, a fair electoral system and equitable distribution of wealth are only demonstrated by 30,000 or 40,000 people. In other words, millions of other people are pleased with the current government. Surely any sane, honest and law-abiding citizen would want a just government and reformation even if he or she does not march for it! In rebuttal, this one man's remark is not as powerful as the unity of 40,000 men and women demonstrating on the street in the heart of KL City. There must be something very wrong about the current government of the country. Now the news is across the globe and the whole world is watching. Investors will be sacred and lost confidence in a country that is infested by corruption.

The remarks by Deputy Prime Minister that "Otherwise, this Government would not have been returned to power in each general election," shall be rebutted by the demonstration of BERSIH. When there is no clean and fair electoral system, there is no credibility of the current government of a fair play in politics. The Government is taking control of mass media and disseminates information that is meant to gain political mileage.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Comments on Nazri: ‘Robin Hood’ still needs to face the music

MIC parliamentarian K. Devamany akin to Robin Hood of robbing the rich and giving to the poor is an absurdity. Devamany was speaking out for the Hindus when their leader Datuk Seri Samy Vellu Sangalimuthu failed to fulfil the wish of his people. Did Devamany rob the Government to give the privilege of "free speech" to the Indians? Free speech is human rights of existence and not to be robbed or to rob for it. Is marginalisation of ethnic Indians breaking the Federal Constitution? One of the effective options for Indians to bring Malaysia to the International Court of Justice is to show to the whole world that they are being oppressed or marginalised in the country.

As regards breaking the law by the illegal gathering of Hindraf, they were denied of the permit by the police in the first place. Now with the marginalisation of the Indians, are they accorded with equal rights as the UMNO members to obtain rally permit? Some of the Indians lawyers had made petition and yet it was denied with lame excuses such as traffic jams. Yet one see rampant traffic congestion in KL when there is no street demonstration. It was the police road blocks which caused the traffic jams. But which rally planned by UMNO was denied of permit by the police? I suppose none.

Hindraf's memorandum appeals to Britain to refer Malaysia to the World Court for crimes against ethnic Indians. It also claimed that "100 over Indians were slashed and killed by the Umno-controlled Malaysian government in the Kampung Medan mini genocide".

The Indian community expects to get RM1mil each in compensation from its class-action suit filed against the British Government for bringing Indians into Malaya to work as labourers. Undoubtedly they support Hindraf to hold the street demonstration.

Cameron Highlands MP S.K. Devamany's commented in Parliament that the Hindraf demonstration showed there was frustration at the lower levels in the community. Continuous marginalisation of Indians in the country gave them no hope of equal standing with the Malays. Is it the crime for a country to give unequal treatment to the Indians who contributed much to nation building?

Nazri: 'Robin Hood' still needs to face the music

KUALA LUMPUR: Minister in the Prime Minister's Department and deputy chief whip Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz said MIC parliamentarian K. Devamany should not be let off the hook even if the Indian community regarded him as a hero.

"Should we let Robin Hood off the hook just because he is a hero? He robbed the rich and gave to the poor but he was still breaking the law," he said at Parliament lobby yesterday.

"Should we encourage people to be popular among the community by breaking ranks? Or should we consider the welfare of the whole BN?"

Nazri, who is in charge of parliamentary affairs, maintained that Devamany had "broken ranks" when he disputed the MIC's stand with regard to Sunday's Hindraf demonstration. He said Devamany also broke ranks when he said the Government failed to address the issues of the Indian community.

He reiterated his stand that if Devamany had disputed his own party, he should resign from the MIC.

Nazri said Devamany would have to explain his remarks to Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, who is the Barisan chief whip, tomorrow.

"In my opinion, there has been a breaking in ranks," Nazri said, adding that if Devamany wanted to be a "fighter" then he should not put his party in a difficult position.

Nazri said the demonstration on Sunday would not change the Government's perception towards the Indian community in general.

He said the Government believed that the other one million Indians in the country who did not participate in the rally were fully behind the Government.

"Some 20,000 penyangak (crooks) who participated in the rally will not alter our viewpoint of the entire community," he said.

Meanwhile, International Movement for a Just World president Dr Chandra Muzaffar said it was not right to put a racial slant to a gathering. Dr Chandra said that while he respected a person's right to gather, he did not agree with the racial stance taken and the violence that reportedly occurred.

================================================
COMMENTS:
Datuk Seri Mohd Nazri is found to be incompetent in his capacity as a law minister of his country Malaysia. He bluffed that his nation has "Witness Protection Bill" recently tabled in the Parliament when there was none yet at the time of his statement.

Nazri should apologise – That's the decent thing to do!

Wednesday, 10 October 2007

De facto law minister Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz owes the nation an apology. He had misled the nation by claiming the existence of a "Witness Protection Bill", when no such Bill exists. It is really shocking that the minister in charge of law should be so ignorant in matters of the law but is so loud in his views in making reference to a non-existing Bill

The decent thing for him to do when his ignorance was exposed is to apologise unreservedly. Instead he blames his secretary for failing to issue a clarification to the media. We are not interested in his wishy-washy excuse couched as 'clarification'. Clarification is only needed or provided when one is misunderstood. In this case there was no misunderstanding. He was understood perfectly when he stated that "cover for informants was provided for under the Witness Protection Bill tabled recently in Parliament."

But the truth of the matter is that no such bill has been tabled in Parliament for first reading. In other words, according to the facts he has not been truthful in making such claims. Some people would even argue that he had lied.

That being the case what is there to clarify? And why should his secretary clarify on his behalf? Is it beneath him to personally say, "I am sorry?"

Malaysians would want to know why there is so much emphasis placed in wanting to know the identity of the person who recorded the "Lingam tape". Shouldn't we be focused on the contents of the tape, which has disparaged the entire system of justice and the judiciary? Are we after the truth or after the person who blew the whistle?

There is no need for Nazri to look into the possibilities of arranging for plastic surgery to give a new identity to protect the witness or to relocate him or her elsewhere. All these are unnecessary and even would constitute a waste of effort. All that is required to know the person responsible for the "Lingam tape" - if that is the priority for Nazri – is to appointment a Royal Commission of Inquiry.

We have been told that the person who taped the conversation is prepared to come forward openly, boldly and without a new identity to reveal himself and tell his side of the story. We don't need a new Bill and we need not enact a new law to find out the identity of this person.

Nazri has stated that the three-man panel will be rendered useless unless witnesses come forward. But they are not going to come forward. The panel is not going to summon them; neither are they going to compel anyone to step forward with their evidence. After 30 days, we will discover that the three-man panel was appointed to undertake a task in futility.

This is why Aliran has from the onset rejected the panel and consistently insisted on the setting up of a Royal Commission of Inquiry.

The BN government must decide whether it truly wants to clean up the judiciary and restore the people's confidence in an institution so vital in upholding the Federal Constitution.

P Ramakrishnan
President

10 October 2007

Monday, November 26, 2007

Malaysia: No Freedom of Worship for Muslims - Court

Comments:

In a country where democracy is practised and the freedom of worship is enshrined in the Constitution, a Muslim is not free to renounce his or her faith in Islam. The Federal Constitution based on English common law system is the supreme Constitution of the land while Syariah laws is enforceable only to Muslims.

When it comes to the issue on Islamic religion and apostasy, the Federal Court refuses to exert its rights to interpret the Constitution it was originally meant for.

Recalling the Lingam video clip scandal on the fixing on appointment of judges, one can perceive that the decision of the Federal Judges are not impartial and without fear. Those 2 Judges are also disqualified from the trial of apostasy because they were most likely Muslims. Hence their judgment was erroneous and not in accordance with the Federal Constitution.

The Judges concerned were compelled to please the Muslims community by twisting the Constitution that it does not apply to Muslims. So democracy does not apply to Muslims too but to non-Muslims. What kind of mockery for the Judges to interpret the Constitution as they wished. Now when a Muslim leaves Islam, he or she is no longer a Muslim but an apostate. Why should he or she still subject him or her to Islamic laws?

The Quran never declare that apostate is prohibited and one can quote a verse to me if there is one. It was the practice of Muhammad's time that apostate should be killed for causing the disgrace to Islam. But tradition of Muhammad cannot be equated to the words of Allah in the Quran. In other words, when there is no clear verses in the Quran which prohibits a Believer to renounce the faith.

There are verses which compel an unbeliever to embrace Islam or face the consequence of death or to pay tax for the rights to practise their belief.

Noble Quran 9:29 says, Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the religion of truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low. (Is this violence avoidable?)

At other verse Noble Quran 2:62 says, Lo! those who believe (in that which is revealed unto thee, Muhammad), and those who are Jews, and Christians, and Sabaeans whoever believeth in Allah and the Last Day and doeth right surely their reward is with their Lord, and there shall no fear come upon them neither shall they grieve.

This leads to another question: Why should an unbeliever pays tax for his freedom of worship or else face with the consequences? In a civil society, those practices that hurt other non believers should have rightfully put aside. The verses that are inappropriate to present society could have been abrogated with one better.

Surah/Chapter 002 - Al-Baqarah Verse 106

(The Noble Qur'an): Such of Our revelations as We ABROGATE or cause to be forgotten, we bring (in place) one better or the like thereof. Knowest thou not that Allah is Able to do all things?

Let the Muslims examine the above verse in its original context. One can find some translator interpolate it or alter its original meaning as in this translation.

[002:106] None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar: Knowest thou not that God Hath power over all things?

====================================

Malaysia: No Freedom of Worship for Muslims - Court

Written by Baradan Kuppusamy

Friday, 01 June 2007

(IPS) - The stunning decision by Malaysia's highest secular court this week that freedom of worship, a constitutional guarantee, does not apply to Malay Muslims is a major blow to freedom and constitutional democracy, lawyers and human rights activists say.

The Federal Court also reaffirmed that the civil court had no jurisdiction over any Islamic matters, even when non-Muslims are involved.

Wednesday's verdict does not end the Muslim, non-Muslim divide, but may cause it to worsen as the tussle for primacy between inherited secular guarantees and a resurgent Islam demanding pre-eminence for Shariah laws continues, said observers.

Non-Muslim leaders -- both political and religious -- reacted with shock and disbelief after the apex court ruled in a majority 2-1 decision that a Muslim cannot rely on Article 11 that guarantees freedom of worship to leave Islam but must go to a Shariah court to get a certificate to turn apostate.

Ironically, Shariah law does not permit Muslims to become apostate but instead prescribes punishment with fines, forced rehabilitation or jail term.

"Muslims going to Shariah court would incriminate themselves, invite prosecution," said Justice Richard Malajum, the dissenting judge, in the verdict who held that Article 11 applies to all citizens alike without discrimination.

The ruling, which is binding on all lower civil courts, will affect at least a dozen cases of apostasy pending in civil courts, mainly involving Muslim converts who want to return to their former religions.

It will also impact negatively on many cases where non-Muslims are fighting for justice such as custody of children, sharing of matrimonial wealth, maintenance and dissolution of civil marriage -- after one partner converts to Islam and relies on Shariah law to settle contentious issues.

"The judgment does not end the Muslim, non-Muslim divide but has instead widened it by introducing Islamic principles into secular, constitutional matters," opposition leader Lim Kit Siang in an IPS interview.

"A political solution is urgently needed to resolve this potentially dangerous disquiet," he told IPS. ''It is necessary for the government to take immediate steps to promote and protect the supremacy of the constitution," Lim said.

Sisters in Islam, a prominent rights group for Muslim women, said it was disappointed the constitution had not been upheld. "For us, the dissenting judgment is significant," said Zainah Anwar, executive director. "The Federal Court, the apex court of the country, is divided over this issue, as the country is divided on it."

''There is a strong dissenting judgmentàthis issue is not over yet,'' said Malik Imtiaz Sarvar who handled several apostasy and other related cases in court.

''This decision reflects a growing trend of decisions in the courts where civil courts are abdicating their responsibility of providing legal redress to individuals who only seek to profess and live their religion according to their conscience,'' said Bishop Paul Tan of the Christian Federation of Malaysia.

''It is pressing for the government and lawmakers to revisit the relevant legislation and to reinstate the jurisdiction of the civil courts so that equal protection of the right to choose and express one's religion is accorded to all Malaysians, as enshrined in Article 11,'' he said in a statement.

The ruling threatens to polarise an already polarised society with non-Muslims seeing the verdict as a confirmation that "creeping Islam" is eating into constitutional guarantees to religious freedom.

Muslims however see the verdict as a victory and final confirmation that Shariah is superior to secular laws that are based on English common law foundation.

Yusri Mohamad, the head of a coalition of about 80 Muslim NGOs called Pembela (Protector) that strongly campaigned for supremacy of Shariah, said justice had been served by the verdict. "The verdict is just and a relief to all Malaysians, Muslims and non-Muslims," Yusri told about 300 Muslims gathered outside the court. "It should not be perceived as a victory for Muslims and a loss to non-Muslims," he said.

The verdict centred on a Malay woman, Azlina Jailani, 43, born a Muslim, who converted to Christianity in 1989 and changed her name to Lina Joy. She fell in love with an Indian Christian cook and wanted to marry in a civil ceremony and raise a family of her own.

But Joy's national identity card referred to her as a Muslim although she had embraced Christianity. She fought the Islamic authorities and the national registration department for nine years to change her religious identity officially and move on.

Joy's struggle became a test case for religious freedom in Malaysia with Muslims and non-Muslims rallying to her cause, especially her right to freedom of worship.

"There was widespread hope that the Federal Court would stand firm and uphold the constitution especially Article 11, but that is not the case," said a prominent human rights activist who did not want to be identified fearing persecution. "It is a sad day for freedom and judicial independence," she said.

Chief Justice Ahmad Fairuz Abdul Halim, who delivered the main judgment, held that Muslims cannot join or leave a religion according to their "whims and fancies.''

Muslims, he said, ''have to follow the requirements of their religion which is a complete religionàa way of life."

Joy, who is believed to be in hiding, through her lawyer Benjamin Dawson expressed deep dissatisfaction at the verdict.

"I am disappointed that the Federal Court is not able to vindicate a simple but important fundamental right that exists for all persons; namely, the right to believe in the religion of one's choice and equally important, the right to marry a person of one's choice and to raise a family," she said.

"The Court has not only denied me that right but to all Malaysians who value fundamental freedoms," she said. "It is extremely difficult to exercise freedom of conscience here now."

"Freedom of religion here is an illusion," said Leonard Teoh, a lawyer for the Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism which also campaigned to protect Article 11.

Lawyers feel that outside of a political solution, there is little else that activists can do after the court ruling. "A political solution has to come from the office of Prime Minister Abdullah Badawiàhe has to lead the way to protect the constitution and the rule of law," said Lim Guan Eng, secretary general of the Democratic Action party, the biggest opposition party in parliament.

"When the courts have failed, parliament has to step in and make legislative changes to clarify issues and uphold secular rights which are the basis for a legal and modern society," Lim told IPS.

But Badawi's ruling National Front government has a stranglehold on parliament controlling 90 percent of the 217 seats -- a massive majority that can steamroll any opposition.

"Ultimately the solution is in the hands of the voters," Lim said. "Whether they speak up or remain silent."

Source: IPS - Inter Press Service News Agency

Comments:

Malaysian Muslims practise no compulsion in religion and do not kill their family members who leave Islam. In Muslim country like Egypt, one can read the story of attempted killing in the name of Allah. In a civil society where democracy is practised, freedom of worship is the essence of democracy and is enshrined in the Constitution. Here is a story of a man who was almost killed by his father and secret police but a true God saved him.



==============================================

The Story of M A Gabriel, former professor of Islamic history at Al-Azhar University , Cairo , Egypt


Disillusioned at Al-Azhar
Fifteen years ago I was the imam of a mosque in the city of Giza
, Egypt , which is where the famous Egyptian pyramids are located. (Imam of a mosque is a position similar to pastor of a Christian church.) I preached the message of the week on Fridays from 12 to 1 in the afternoon, as well as performed other duties.

One Friday the topic of my message was jihad. I told the two hundred fifty people seated on the ground before me:


Jihad in Islam is defending the Islamic nation and Islam against the attacks of the enemies. Islam is a religion of peace and only will fight against one who fights it. These infidels, heathens, perverts, Christians and Allah's grievers, the Jews, out of envy of peaceful Islam and its prophet—they spread the myth that Islam is promulgated by the sword and violence. These infidels, the accusers of Islam, do not acknowledge Allah's words.

At this point I quoted from the Quran:
And do not kill anyone whose killing Allah has forbidden, except for a just cause.
—Surah 17:33, The Noble Quran
When I spoke these words, I was just freshly graduated from Al-Azhar
University in Cairo , Egypt —the oldest and most prestigious Islamic university in the world. It serves as the spiritual authority for Islam worldwide. I was teaching at the university, and I was an imam on the weekend sat this mosque.


I preached my sermon on jihad that day according to the philosophy of the Egyptian government. Al-Azhar
University focused us on the politically correct Islam and purposely overlooked areas of teaching that conflicted with the authority of Egypt .


I was preaching what they taught me, but inside I was confused about the truth of Islam. But if I wanted to keep my job and my status at Al-Azhar, I needed to keep my thoughts to myself. After all, I knew what happened to people who differed from Al-Azhar's agenda. They would be fired and would not be accepted to teach at any other university in the nation.


However, I knew that what I was teaching at the mosque and at Al-Azhar was not what I'd seen in the Quran, which I had memorized in its entirety by the age of twelve. What confused me the most was that I was told to preach about an Islam of love, kindness and forgiveness. At the same time, Muslim fundamentalists—the ones who were supposed to be practicing true Islam—were bombing churches and killing Christians.


At this time the jihad movement was very active in Egypt
. Reports of bombings and attacks against Christians were common. It was such apart of everyday life that one time I heard a bomb go off at a church as I was riding the bus. I looked and saw a plume of smoke rising up a quarter mile away.


I had been raised in a family that was well established in Islam, and I had studied Islamic history. I was not involved in any radical groups. But one of my Muslim friends was a member of an Islamic group that was actively slaughtering Christians. Ironically, he was a chemistry student and had only recently become serious about his faith. Nevertheless, he was active in jihad. One day I asked him, "Why are you killing our neighbors and countrymen whom we grew up with?"
He was angry and astonished at my challenge. "Out of all Muslims you should know. The Christians did not accept the call of Islam, and they are not willing to pay us the jizyah (tax) to have the right to practice their beliefs. Therefore, the only option they have is the sword of Islamic law."


Seeking the Truth
My conversations with him drove me to pour over the Quran and the books of the Islamic law, hoping to find something to contradict what he said. I couldn't change the reality of what I read.
As a Muslim, I realized I had two options:
I could continue to embrace the "Christianized" Islam—the Islam of peace, love, forgiveness and compassion, the Islam tailor-made to fit Egyptian government, politics and culture—thereby keeping my job and status.
I could become a member of the Islamic movement and embrace Islam according to the Quran and the teachings of Muhammad. Muhammad said, "I left you with something [the Quran]. If you hold on to what I left with you, you will not be led astray forever."


Many times I tried to rationalize the kind of Islam I was practicing by saying to myself, well, you are not too far out. After all, there are verses in the Quran about love, peace, forgiveness and compassion. You only need to ignore the part about jihad and the killing of the non-Muslims.
I went to every interpretation of the Quran trying to avoid jihad and killing non-Muslims, yet I kept finding support of the practice. The scholars agreed that Muslims should enforce jihad on infidels (those who reject Islam) and renegades (those who leave Islam). Yet jihad was not in harmony with other verses that spoke of living at peace with others.


All the contradictions in the Quran were really causing a problem for my faith. I spent four years to earn my bachelor's degree, graduating second out of a class of six thousand. Then there was another four years for my master's and three more for my doctorate—all studying Islam. I knew the teachings well.


In one place alcohol was forbidden; in another it was allowed(compare Surah 5:90–91 with Surah 47:15). In one place it says Christians are very good people who love and worship one God, so you may be friends with them (Surah 2:62, 3:113–114). Then you find other verses that say Christians must convert, pay tax or be killed by the sword (Surah 9:29

).


The scholars had theological solutions to these problems, but I wondered how Allah, almighty and all powerful, could either contradict himself so much or change his mind so much.
Even the prophet of Islam, Muhammad, practiced his faith in ways that contradicted the Quran. The Quran said Muhammad was sent to show the mercy of God to the world. But he became a military dictator, attacking, killing and taking plunder to finance his empire. How is that showing mercy?


Allah, the god revealed in the Quran, is not a loving father. It says that he desires to lead people astray (Surah 6:39 , 126). He does not help those who are led astray by him (Surah 30:29) and desires to use them to populate hell (Surah 32:13).

Islam is full of discrimination—against women, against non-Muslims, against Christians and most especially against Jews. Hatred is built in to the religion.
The history of Islam, which was my special area of study, could only be characterized as a river of blood.


Dangerous Questions
Finally, I reached the point where I was questioning the faith and the Quran with my students at the university. Some of them were members of terrorist movements, and they were enraged: "You can't accuse Islam. What has happened to you? You have to teach us. You have to agree to Islam."
The university heard about it, and I was called in for a meeting in December 1991. To summarize the meeting, I told them what was in my heart: "I can no longer say that the Quran comes directly from heaven or from Allah. This cannot be the revelation of the true God."
These were very blasphemous words, in their opinion. They spat in my face. One man cursed me, "You blasphemer. You bastard." The university fired me and called the Egyptian secret police.

The Secret Police Kidnapped Me
to understand what happened next; you need to have a picture of how my family lived. My father had a very large home that was three stories tall. My whole family lived together in this house—my parents, my four married brothers with their families, my unmarried brother and myself. Only my sister lived elsewhere because she was married and lived with her husband.
The house was divided into many apartments, and we were very comfortable. On the first floor were my parents' apartment and an apartment I shared with my brother. On the floors above us were apartments for my other brothers.


At three o'clock
in the morning on the very same day that the university kicked me out, my father heard knocking at the door of our house. When he opened the door, fifteen to twenty men rushed in carrying Russian Kalashnikov assault weapons. They were not wearing uniforms, just regular clothes. They ran upstairs and all through the house, waking people up and looking for me. I think so many men came in at once so that I couldn't run away before they found me.
They were all over the house before one of them found me asleep in my bed. My parents, brothers, spouses and children were awake, weeping and terrified, as they dragged me away. Everybody in the area heard the commotion.


I was taken to a place that looked like a prison and was placed in a cell. In the morning my parents frantically tried to figure out what had happened to me. Right away they went to the police station and demanded, "Where is our son?" But nobody knew anything about me.
I was in the hands of the Egyptian secret police.

The Egyptian Prison
Spending time with the Egyptian secret police is much different than a visit to an American prison. They put me in a cell with two radical Muslims accused of committing terrorist acts. One was Palestinian and the other Egyptian.


For three days I was given no food or water.


Every day the Egyptian man asked me, "Why are you here?" I refused to answer because I was afraid he would kill me if he knew that I had questioned Islam. On the third day, I told him I was a teacher at Al-Azhar
University and an imam in Giza . Immediately he gave me a plastic bottle of water and some falafel and pita that were brought to him by his visitors, but he told me that the police had warned him not to give me anything.


On the fourth day, the interrogation began. For the next four days the goal of the secret police was to make me confess that I had left Islam and to explain how it happened.
The interrogation began in a room with a large desk. My interrogator sat behind the desk, and I sat on the other side. Behind me were two or three police officers.


They were sure that I had been evangelized and converted to Christianity, so the interrogator kept badgering me, "What pastor did you talk to? What church have you been visiting? Why have you betrayed Islam?"


He asked many questions. One time I hesitated too long when I answered. He nodded to the men behind me. They grabbed my hand and held it down on the desk. My interrogator held a lit cigarette. He reached over and extinguished it into the top of my hand. I still have this scar. I also have the scar on my lip where he did the same thing. Sometimes he used the cigarettes when he got angry; other times the officers just hit me across my face.


As my interrogation continued, the pressure grew stronger. One time they brought a fire poker into the room (the iron rod that you use to move burning wood in a fire). I wondered, what is that for? The next time the interrogator wanted to make his point, I found out. The poker was red hot, and one officer pressed it into the flesh of my left arm.


They wanted me to confess that I had been converted, but I said, "I didn't betray Islam. I just said what I believe. I am an academic person. I am a thinker. I have a right to discuss any subject of Islam. This is part of my job and part of any academic life. I could not even dream of converting from Islam—it is my blood, my culture, my language, my family, my life. But if you accuse me of converting from Islam for what I say to you, then take me out of Islam. I don't mind to be out of Islam."


The Whip
My answer was not what they wanted to hear. I was taken to a room with a steel bed in it. They tied my feet to the foot of the bed and then put heavy stockings on them, almost like oven mitts.
One officer had a black whip, about four feet long, and he began whipping my feet. Another officer sat down next to me at the head of the bed with a pillow in his hands. When I cried out, he pushed the pillow into my face until I was quiet. I could not stop crying out, so a second officer came to put an extra pillow over my face.


As I was beaten I went unconscious, but when I woke up the officer was still whipping my feet. Then he stopped and they untied me, and one officer commanded, "Stand up." I couldn't at first, but he took the whip and beat my back until I stood.


Then he showed me a long passageway and said, "Run." Again, when I couldn't do it, he whipped my back until I ran down the passageway. When I got to the end, there was another officer waiting for me. He whipped me until I ran back to where I came from. They made me run back and forth.
Later, I learned why they did that. The running was so that my feet wouldn't swell. The stockings were so I wouldn't have marks on my feet from the whipping. I assume the pillows were so nobody could hear my cries.


Next I was taken to something that looked like a small, aboveground swimming pool. It was filled with ice-cold water. The officer with the whip said, "Get in," so I got in. It was so cold that I tried to get out, but he whipped me every time I made a move.
I have low blood sugar, and it wasn't very long before I passed out from the cold. When I woke up I was lying on my back in the bed where they whipped my feet, still in my wet clothes.


A Night in the Dark
One evening I was taken outside behind the building. I saw what looked like a small, concrete room with no windows or doors. The only opening was a skylight on the roof. They made me climb a ladder to the top and demanded, "Get in." When I sat on the edge and put my feet down in the opening, I felt water. I could also see there was something swimming on the top of the water. This is my grave, I thought. They are going to kill me today.


I slid down into the opening and felt the water rise up over my body, but then to my surprise I felt solid ground under my feet. The water only came up to my shoulders. Then rats, which were what I saw swimming in the water, started crawling all over my head and face. These rats had not been fed for a very long time. My interrogators were being clever. "This guy is a Muslim thinker," they said, "so we will have the rats eat his head."


I was very scared for the first minute after they closed the skylight. They left me there all night and then came back the next morning to see if I were alive. When the skylight opened and I saw the sunlight, it was hope for me that I had survived and was still alive.
All that night not one rat bit me. They climbed all over my head and in my hair and played with my ears. One rat stood on my shoulders. I felt their mouths against my face, but it almost felt like kisses. I never felt a tooth. The rats were utterly faithful to me. Even today when I see a rat, I have a feeling of respect. I cannot explain why the rats behaved this way.


Meeting with a Dear Friend
The interrogation was not over. Later the officers took me to the door of a small room and said, "There is someone who loves you very much who wants to meet with you."
I asked, "Who is this?" I was hoping it was one of my family members or a friend to visit me or get me out of prison.


They said, "You don't know him, but he knows you." They opened the door to the room, and inside I saw a big dog. There was nothing else in the room. Two people took me inside and then left me and shut the door.


This was the first time my heart cried out. In my heart I cried to my Creator, You are my father, my God.You are to look after me. How can you leave me in these evil hands? I don't know what these people are trying to do to me, but I know you will be with me and one day I will see you and meet you.


I walked to the middle of the empty room and slowly sat down cross-legged on the floor. The dog came and sat down in front of me. Minutes went by as this dog looked me over. I watched his eyes move from top to bottom over and over again. I went in my heart to prayer to the God I did not yet know.


The dog got up and started walking in circles around me, liken animal about to eat something. Then he came to my right side and licked year with his tongue. He sat down by my right side and just stayed there. I was so exhausted. After he just sat there for a while, I fell asleep.
When I woke up, the dog was in the corner of the room. He ran to me, as if to say good morning. Then he licked my right ear again and sat down again at my right side.
When the officers opened the door they saw me praying with the dog sitting next to me. I heard one say, "I can't believe this man is a human being. This man is a devil—he's Satan."
The other replied, "I don't believe that. There is unseen power standing behind this man and protecting him."


"Which power? This man is an infidel. It's got to be Satan because this man is against Allah."
Someone watching over me they took me back to my cell. While I was gone, my Egyptian cellmate had asked the police, "Why are you persecuting this man?"
They told him, "Because he is denying Islam." That made my cellmate furious. As soon as I got back in the cell, he was ready to kill me. But I had only been in there fifteen to twenty minutes when a police officer came with transfer papers for this man and took him away.
I had to ask myself, What is going on here? What power is protecting me? At that time, I did not know the answer.
I did not spend much time wondering about it. In a short while my own transfer papers came through. I was to be taken to a permanent prison in southern Cairo
.
At this point I did not think that my interrogators were even human. I had been arrested for merely questioning Islam. Now my faith was really shaken. And I was on my way to another prison.

The next week I spent in a prison in southern Cairo
. It was relatively relaxed time. God sent me a prison guard who did not agree with radical Islam.
All during this time my family was trying to find out where I was. They had no success until my mother's brother, who was a high-ranking member of the Egyptian Parliament, returned to the country after traveling overseas. My mother called him, sobbing, "For two weeks we have not known where our son is. He is gone." My uncle had the connections that were needed. Fifteen days after I was kidnapped, he came to the prison personally with the release papers and took me home.


Later, the police gave my father this report:
We have received a fax from Al-Azhar
University accusing your son of leaving Islam, but after an interrogation of fifteen days, we found no evidence to support it.
My father was relieved to hear this. Out of all my brothers and sisters, I was the only one who had studied Islam at the university, and he was very proud of me. He could not even imagine I would ever leave Islam, so he attributed the whole incident to a bad attitude toward my scholarship on the part of the people at the university.
"We don't need them," he said, and he asked me to start work immediately as a sales director for his factory. He owned a successful business that produced leather jackets and men's and women's clothing.


A Year without Faith
For one year I lived without any faith. I had no God to pray to, to call to, to live for. I believed in the existence of a God who was merciful and righteous, but I had no idea who He was. Was He the God of the Muslims, the Christians or the Jews? Or was He some animal—like the cow of the Hindus? I had no knowledge of how to find Him.
You have to understand that if a Muslim comes to the conclusion that Islam is not the truth and he has no religion to turn to, it is the most difficult time in his life. Faith is in the fabric of the life of a Middle Eastern person. He cannot imagine how to live without knowing his God.
During this whole year, my physical body expressed the pain that was in my spirit. Though I had every material thing I needed, I was plagued with a deep tiredness from constantly trying to use my mind to figure out the identity of the true God. I suffered constantly from headaches. I went to a doctor who was a relative of the family. He did a scan of my brain, but heeded not find anything wrong. He prescribed some tablets that helped.


The Sermon on the Mount
I ended up visiting a nearby pharmacy one or two times a week for packets of tablets, getting a small number of tablets each time, hoping the headaches would just go away for good. After I had been coming for a while, the pharmacist asked me, "What is going on in your life?"
I told her, "Nothing is going on. I have no complaint except for one thing: I am living without God. I don't know who is my God, who created me and created the universe."
She said, "But you were a professor at the most respected Islamic university in Egypt
. Your family is very respected in the community."
"That is true," I replied, "but I have discovered falsehoods in their teachings. I no longer believe my home and family are built on a foundation of truth. I had always clothed myself in the lies of Islam. Now I feel naked. How can I fill the emptiness in my heart? Please help me.
"
"OK," she said. "Today I will give you these tablets, and I will give you this book—the Bible. But please promise me not to take any tablets before you read something from this book."


I took the book home and opened it at random. My eyes fell on Matthew 5:38:
You have heard that it was said, "Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth." But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
My whole body began trembling. I had studied the Quran my whole life—not once did I find words as inspiring as this. I had come face to face with the Lord Jesus Christ.
I lost all track of time. It felt as if I were sitting on a cloud above a hill, and in front of me was the greatest teacher in the universe telling me about the secrets of heaven and the heart of God.
I could easily compare the Bible to what I had learned from my years of studying the Quran, and there was no doubt in my mind that I was finally encountering the true God. I was still reading in the early hours of the next day, and by dawn I gave my heart to Jesus.


Ambushed
I only told the pharmacist and his wife that I had accepted Jesus, but in Egypt, if anyone left Islam, it was automatically assumed that he had become a Christian and therefore must be killed. Because of this, fundamentalists sent two men to ambush me and kill me.
It happened when I was walking home from visiting a friend. It was only a fifteen- or twenty-minute walk through Giza
. I was on Tersae Street , near my home, when I saw two men standing in front of a grocery shop. They we redressed traditionally with the long, white robes, long beards and head coverings. I thought they were just customers. I never imagined they would do anything to me.


When I reached the shop, they stopped me, and then suddenly both pulled out knives and began trying to stab me. I had no weapon, and because it was a hot day, I was just wearing a T-shirt and pants. I put up my hands to protect myself. Again and again the blades struck me and cut my wrists.


There were other people on the street, but no one helped me. They just gathered to watch. This was typical for those years. People would intervene if it was just a fistfight, but they wouldn't get involved with knives. They also didn't want to be in the way if someone pulled a gun.
The first attacker was trying to stab my heart. He almost did it, but I moved. He missed by about five inches and got me in the shoulder instead. When he pulled the knife out, I remember looking down and seeing the blood come out in a stream.


I fell to the ground and just curled up in a little ball, trying to protect myself. Then the other attacker tried to stab me in the stomach, but the blade turned, and he stabbed me in the shin instead.


By this time I had lost so much blood that I passed out. There was no hope for me until two police officers arrived on motorcycles and my attackers ran away.
I was taken to the hospital and treated. In the hospital, the police asked if I knew why I was attacked. I said I did not.
Again, my father rejected any evidence that I was abandoning Islam. He just could not think in those terms.


My Father Learns the Truth
I continued to work for my father and did not speak of my new faith. In fact, he sent me to South Africa
in 1994 to explore business opportunities for him. While there, I spent three days with a Christian family from India . When we parted, they gave me a small cross on a necklace to wear. This small cross marked the turning point in my life.


After a little more than a week, my father noticed the chain on my neck and became very upset because, according to Islamic culture, only women are allowed to wear jewelry around their necks. "Why do you wear this chain?" he demanded.


It seemed as if my tongue spoke on its own as I replied," Father, this is not a chain. This is a cross. It represents Jesus, who died on a cross like this for me, for you and for everybody in the whole world. I received Jesus as my God and Savior, and I pray for you and for the rest of my family to also accept Jesus Christ as your Savior."


First, my father fainted right there in the street. Some of my brothers rushed out to him, and my mother started crying in fear. I stayed with them as they bathed my father's face with water. When he came to, he was so upset he could hardly speak, but he pointed at me. In a voice hoarse with rage he cried out, "Your brother is a convert. I must kill him today!"
Wherever he went, my father carried a gun under his arm on a leather strap. (Most wealthy people in Egypt

carry guns.) He pulled out his gun and pointed it at me. I started running down the street, and as I dived around a corner, I heard the bullets whining past me. I kept running for my life.
Leaving My Home Forever

I ran to my sister's house, which was about half a mile away. I asked her to help me get my passport, clothes and other documents from my father's house. She wanted to know what was wrong, and I told her, "Father wants to kill me." She wanted to know why, and I said, "I don't know. You must ask Father."


When I ran away, my father knew exactly where I was headed because my sister and I were very close, and her house was nearby. My father had walked to my sister's house, and he arrived while she and I were talking. He banged on the door, crying with tears streaming down his face, "My daughter, please open the door." Then he shouted, "Your brother is a convert! He has left the Islamic faith. I must kill him now!"


My sister opened the door and tried to calm him down. "Father, he is not here. Maybe he went to another place. Why don't you go home and relax, and later we can talk about this as a family."
My sister had mercy on me and gathered my things from my parents' house. She and my mother gave me some money, and I got in my car and drove away on the evening of August 28, 1994

.
For three months I struggled to travel through Northern Egypt
, Libya , Chad and Cameroon . I finally stopped in the Congo. At that point I had malaria. They found an Egyptian doctor to examine me. He said that I would be dead by morning, and they made arrangements to get a coffin from Congo 's Egyptian embassy to send me back home.
To their shock, I woke up the next morning. I left the hospital after five days and started to tell people everywhere about what Jesus did for me.


Life as a Follower of Jesus
Ten years have gone by since I accepted the Lord Jesus as my Savior. He called me and gave me a personal relationship with Him—something that Islam never offered.
I have never stopped crying for my Muslim people, whom I left behind, asking the Lord to deliver them from the darkness of Islam.


As you read the pages of this book, you will come to understand how great this darkness is. It is the teachings of Islam that have produced terrorists who seem capable of any kind of evil in the name of Allah.


Now the whole world wants to understand what Islam teaches. A great amount of misinformation has been shared in the media and on the Internet. My goal is to help you see plainly why these people do what they do.


I don't want to motivate you to anger, however. I want to motivate you to believe—to believe for the fall of Islam and the release of its captives, in Jesus' name.

Source: http://www.arabicbible.com/testimonies/testimonial.htm (Copyright)

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Members of Parliament or State Assembly Grading System

Members of Parliament or State Assembly Grading System.

The Objective of this grading System is to make an assessment of the performance of the Members of Parliament or State Assembly akin to Key Performance Index (KPI) practised by big corporations.  

Items to be circled and added up all the marks equivalent to the Grade A, B, C & F.

1. Leadership

- Vision minded 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

- Mission & initiative 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2. Integrity

- Declare the assets as required 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

- Fulfill the promises to the People 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

 

3. Commitment

- People's mouth piece or spoke man at the assembly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

- Present regularly for the Assembly 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

 

4. Sociable

- Approachable when you really need to meet him/her 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

- Present at functions and social gatherings etc 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

 

5. Belief: The Rukun Negara spells "Belief in God" as the first in the order

- Believe in God 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

- Practise whatever the religion teaches 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

 

The lowest allocated mark is 1 and 10 is the highest mark for each question. This will sum up to 100%. Based on this 100%, you design a grading system, such as:

90-100    = A
70-89      = B
50-69       = C
Below 50  = F (Failed)

Candidate Grading System is able to create a fairer system (at least) when we do our checking on a candidate's performance.

A scientific (management) process rather than irrational judgment, and of course, management is a science. A society must keep moving upwards in its overall intellectual pursuit. As far as things are changing better, it is acceptable. Most of the time the compassion for a candidate who can make persuasive speeches during campaign win the minds and hearts of the voters. Voters have to be wise and educated in order to achieve what one's desire from the candidate.
 
Now apply the above criteria, kindly grade the candidates in Sarawak and West Malaysia top leaders.
 

 

Forum: 1988 Judiciary Crisis in Malaysia

Some background on the 1988 Judiciary Crisis in Malaysia was discussed during the Forum.

It shed lights on the transformation of the independent judiciary system to the one under the control of the Executive (PM). It is very informative and recommend for all readers to view as what had happened that led to the present state of the judiciary system.

September 13, 2007

Forum: 1988 Judiciary crisis in Malaysia

A discussion of a Malaysian event, which has some historical significance. Might be of interest to academics, think tanks, policy makers, and other students of Emerging Market politics.







Comments: PM denied Indians to hold peaceful street demonstration.

At least 5,000 ethnic Indian men gathered outside Kuala Lumpur's famous Petronas Towers, carrying Malaysian flags and placards today ( 25-11-2007) despite the warning from the Police of illegal gathering.

PM: We have to take action if people commit offences

DEVID RAJAH IN KAMPALA 

KAMPALA (Uganda): Do not take the police action against three activists of the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) as a racial issue, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi warned. 

"It has nothing to do with race. People should stop linking or viewing everything that happens in the country as a racial matter," the Prime Minister said.  

He added that people should not be too quick to make unfounded claims, saying that those who commit offences would have to face charges. 

On Friday, police arrested lawyers P. Waythamoorthy, who is Hindraf chief, his brother P. Uthayakumar and V. S. Ganapathi Rao for allegedly uttering seditious words in speeches made at a gathering in Batang Berjuntai, Selangor, on Nov 16. 

They were charged at a Sessions Court in Klang. All three claimed trial. 

The police had also rejected an application by Hindraf to gather outside the British High Commission today to hand over a petition over a class action suit against the British government for bringing Indians to pre-independence Malaya as labourers and exploiting them. 

At least 25 Indian-based groups have dissociated themselves from the gathering and had called on the organisers to cancel their march. 

Abdullah, who is Internal Security Minister, said the police had evidence to charge Waythamoorthy and the other two for making seditious statements and speeches. 

The police had been monitoring the activities of the three men and their group for a while now, he told Malaysian journalists at the end of the first day of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting here on Friday. 

"We have to take action if these people have clearly committed offences," said Abdullah, adding that the arrests and charging of the three Hindraf organisers were not related to the group's planned protest in Kuala Lumpur.  

Responding to a question, he asked: "What can we do if people want to take to the streets to protest instead of using the proper channels?" 

"If they have committed an offence, then they are wrong.  

"We are not out to victimise anyone. If someone is wrong, then the person must be charged and brought to justice," Abdullah said.  

He said that if people were allowed to openly commit offences, others who were law-abiding citizens would become angry and upset with the authorities.  

Hindraf: Just give us an hour to hand petition

KUALA LUMPUR: The Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) will go ahead with its gathering today and has asked to be given "one hour maximum" to hand over its petition to the British High Commission. 

A. Sivanesan, one of the lawyers representing the three Hindraf members who were charged with sedition at the Klang Sessions Court on Friday, said the gathering would go ahead as planned. 

He noted that on Friday, a huge crowd had gathered in Klang outside the court and made its way to the Sri Rajeshwari temple a kilometre away and "not a single flower pot was damaged." 

"The Government need not fear. It is an orderly crowd," he said of today's planned gathering. 

"It is away from the city and 60% of the shops in that area are closed on Sunday. We are not going to be a nuisance to the people," he added.  

Sivanesan believes the police had overreacted by having roadblocks all over the city. 

"The duty of the police should be to control the traffic – nothing more than that. 

"Just give us a chance. It will be an hour maximum. We will hand over the petition to the British High Commission, speak to the crowd, and then we will go back," he said. 

Meanwhile, the five lawyers who were served a restraining order on Friday morning barring them from organising or participating in the rally have asked for an immediate hearing to appeal against it. 

The five – P. Waythamoorthy, P. Uthayakumar, V. S. Ganapathi Rao, R. Kenghadran and M. Manoharan – faxed 10 copies of their notice to the Kuala Lumpur High Court. 

Waythamoorthy, Uthayakumar and Ganapathi Rao were charged with sedition later that day. 

The law firm, which applied for the notice of appeal, said the five were dissatisfied with the magistrate's court decision to issue the court order against them. 

They asked the court for immediate decision in view of the fact that the planned gathering was today. The courts are closed on weekends.  

 

 

Demonstrators demand equal rights
Posted by Chinese and Indians not treated as Malaysians on
November 25, 2007 at 12:39:52:

Hindus, police clash in Malaysia

* Story Highlights
* Public transportation into the city was halted
* Protests follow largest demonstration in nearly a decade
* Demonstrators demand equal rights

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia -- More than 5,000 Hindu protesters met water cannons and tear gas in Malaysia's capital, Kuala Lumpur, on Sunday while demanding equal rights and consideration from the government.

Ethnic Indian protesters are sprayed with water by Malaysian riot police in Kuala Lumpur on Sunday.

Despite clashes with police, there were no reports of injuries during the planned protest. Some protesters threw rocks at the water cannon trucks, but others were urging peaceful demonstrations.

Public transportation into the city was stopped, hindering protesters from coming in.

Police stopped protesters as they tried to take a petition to the British High Commission. Talks were under way for authorities to allow six protesters to deliver the petition, should the crowd disperse.

Earlier this month, riot police used water hoses and tear gas against thousands of protesters demanding electoral reform, the largest demonstration in Kuala Lumpur in nearly a decade.

 

 

The gov't rejected claims of unfair discrimination
Posted by Chinese and Indians are marginalised in
Malaysia ! on November 25, 2007 at 12:45:07:


Malaysian police break up rally

Malaysian riot police used tear gas on the protesters
Malaysian police have clashed with ethnic Indian protesters in
Kuala Lumpur, the country's capital.

Tear gas and water cannon were used to disperse a crowd of over 5,000 people as they rallied outside the British High Commission.

The protesters are calling for reparations from the UK for sending Indians to Malaysia as indentured labourers a century ago.

The activists also demand measures to improve the living standards of Hindus.

At least 5,000 ethnic Indian men gathered outside Kuala Lumpur 's famous Petronas Towers , carrying Malaysian flags and placards.

Some demonstrators were beaten and bundled into police vans, as tear gas and water cannon were fired into the crowd, according to the Associated Press news agency.

Unfair treatment

Organisers had pledged that the demonstration would be peaceful, but Malaysian authorities nevertheless banned it, fearing that it could inflame racial tensions.


Indians are treated like third-class citizens
M. Kulasegaran, Opposition politician

In pictures: Malaysia rally

The ostensible aim of the rally was to call on the British government to pay $4 trillion (£2 trillion) in compensation to the two million ethnic Indians in Malaysia whose ancestors were taken to the country as indentured labourers in the 19th century.

But the BBC's Robin Brant in Kuala Lumpur says the real goal of the demonstrators is to highlight what they see as the unfair treatment of minority Indians in Malaysia.

Ethnic Indians - mainly Hindus - form one of Malaysia 's largest minority groups.

Activists say that many Hindus live in poverty, partly because of policies granting jobs and economic advantages to the ethnic Malay Muslim majority.

"Indians are treated like third-class citizens. The community has been suffering in silence for decades," said opposition politician M. Kulasegaran.

The government has rejected claims of unfair discrimination.

In advance of the rally, three leading members of the group behind the protest - the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) - were arrested.

The three men were later charged with making seditious comments - and could face up to three years in jail if convicted.

 

Saturday, November 24, 2007

Most Malaysians who give up citizenship are Chinese because of marginalisation

COMMENTS

The Chinese are marginalised in Malaysia and not accorded with same
privilege as the Malays. That is the main reason for the renouncing of
citizenship for the Chinese. For true racial harmony to be achieved,
there must be one voice, one heart and one citizenship. All Malays,
Chinese, Indians, Ibans. Melanaus and others are the same citizen of
the country. Put aside the terms Bumi and Non-Bumi, and accord the
same privileges to all, then it is a true Malaysian society built upon
one and only Constitution for all races. The rights and privileges of
all races are never divided but united as one in the Constitution.


===============================================


22/11: Most Malaysians who give up citizenship are Chinese


CHINESE make up the largest number of Malaysians who have renounced
their citizenship, followed by Malays and Indians, Parliament was told
yesterday.

The Home Ministry's parliamentary secretary Abdul Rahman Ibrahim said
16,474 Malaysians gave up their citizenship between 2000 and 2006.

Of these, 87 per cent or 14,316 people were Chinese, 1,098 were Malays
(6.6 per cent) and 822 were Indians (5 per cent). The remainder
comprised other races.

Mr Abdul Rahman said these Malaysians had applied for citizenship to
India, Sri Lanka, Singapore, Japan, Canada, Indonesia, Britain, the
United States, Taiwan, Thailand, Germany, New Zealand, France,
Austria, Ireland, Sweden, Belgium, Brunei, Finland and Jordan.

As to why they had opted to leave for other countries, he replied:
'The main reason is the (quality of life) in those countries.'

'They also consider the working environment, such as better
opportunities and better pay. And some consider education for their
children as a reason to apply for citizenship in a particular
country,' he was quoted as saying by the online news portal
Malaysiakini.

Malaysia's First Scorpene Submarine and Mongolian Woman Murder

Comments

Is it a coincidence? It had been rumored a year earlier before the launch of Scorpene Submarine that Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu was an interpreter for the Malaysian buyers of this RM3.4 billion Scorpene submarine deal. It is a right move to spend money on enhancing the defence system especially on the Straits of Malacca that has been infected with piracy and hijacking in this 21st century. However the spending on this submarine may be inflated which may include kickback for brokers.
The murder of Mongolian Altantuya was reportedly related to this submarine deal. A Royal Commission of Inquiry should be set up to probe about this deal. At the moment, the deceased Altantuya could not speak to reveal the motive of her killing and there is insufficient evidence of C-4 explosive to associate with the involvement of the Ministry of Defence. The truth may be revealed in due time and justice will be met when evidence surfaces through the course of time; God's willing. Similarly the scandal on the brokerage of appointment of Judges in 2002 during the tenure of then Tun Dr Mahathir has prompted to set up the Royal Commission after the Opposition actively campaigning for it 5 years later.

"Royal Commissions are called to look into matters of great importance and usually controversy. These can be matters such as government structure, the treatment of minorities, events of considerable public concern or economic questions. Some critics accuse Royal Commissions of being little more than a way to end public criticism of government inaction without actually doing anything."

Without a Royal Commission to investigate the transaction of this submarine purchase and question of C-4 explosive being used to blow up the victim, the public at large is still doubtful about the transparency of this submarine deal. Perhaps, after more evidence become available like of the case of Lingam Video which was purportedly recorded in 2002, then the government will act on it. In the meantime, just sweep the dust under the carpet.

===========================================
Malaysia's First Scorpene Submarine To Be Launched Today (October 22, 2007)

A special report by Roslan Ariffin

Source: http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_lite.php?id=291514 Posted October 23, 2007 16:10 PM

PARIS, Oct 22 (Bernama) -- Malaysia's ambitious plans to have a submarine fleet to enhance the nation's defence capabilities is bearing fruition, with the launch of its first submarine Tuesday.

Unveiling of the Scorpene-class underwater attack craft, is the highlight of a four-day visit to France by Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

In keeping with the world's age-old navy tradition under the British empire that only women should inaugurate a ship, Najib's wife, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor, will have the honour of performing the customary launch by breaking a bottle across the bow of the vessel at DCNS dockyard in the port city of Cherbourg, about 350km from Paris, at 1pm local time (7pm Malaysia time).

Rosmah will also officially name the state-of-the-art submarine as "KD Tunku Abdul Rahman", after Malaysia's first prime minister.

The first of the two submarines ordered for the Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN), the 67.5m-long submarine equipped with torpedoes, sub-surface-to-surface missiles and sea mines, is manned by only a 31-member crew due to high level of automation.

Malaysia ordered for two brand-new Scorpene submarines for RM3.4 billion in 2002 which were jointly built by French shipbuilding giant Defence Conseil National and its Spanish partner, Navantia.

The RMN is expected to take delivery of the vessel inaugurated today in January 2009 and is expected to arrive in Malaysia six months later.

The second submarine, to be named "KD Tun Razak" is expected to be handed over in October 2009 and arrive in the country in March 2010.

A second-hand reconditioned submarine "Quessant", to be used for training purposes, was booked under an agreement with a Malaysian company "Armaris".

The electricity and diesel-powered Scorpene submarine, capable of operating under 350-metre deep water for 40 straight days, is suitable to be deployed in South China Sea and Straits of Melaka.

The new generation Scorpene submarine seen as "adding another feather on the cap" of the navy will surely add more firepower to the navy to protect the country's territorial waters from being encroached into by foreign submarines.

It will complement the navy's current fleet of patrol crafts in meeting the challenges of sea operations.

Currently, only Singapore has four Sewdish-made submarines, while Indonesia is to take delivery of four submarines from South Korea in a few years.

Malaysia's Scorpene submarines are expected to be based at the RM690 million navy base in Sepanggar Bay in Sabah. The 390-hectare base is the biggest navy facility for the Sabah, Sarawak and Labuan territorial waters.

Following acquisition of the submarine, the RMN has established a special submarine unit tasked with the administration of the squadron, training school and logistics for the submarines.

Currently, a 142-member navy crew and officers are undergoing a four-year training programme at the DCN Dockyard in Brest, about 500km from here, to operate the Scorpene submarines.

-- BERNAMA